In its long history, American gerrymandering has taken
on several different forms. Changes in the law resulted in the elimination of
certain forms, as well as the growth of others.
For much of this country’s history, gerrymandering issues
arose from the unequal distribution of voters between districts. Rural areas
were often over-represented in state legislatures because, unlike for US House
districts, there was no law requiring that each elected official have the same
number of constituents. State legislative districts were created based on
geographical features, counties, or other non-population-based factors. This meant
that in some states, there were neighboring districts each with one State
Representative, but with populations differing by a factor of five. A vote in
one of these districts was worth five times as much as a vote in the other.
This week, I studied the Supreme Court decisions that
illegalized this type of population-based gerrymandering. These decisions,
however, did not end gerrymandering as a whole, since racial and partisan
gerrymandering soon became dominant forces on the American political stage.
No comments:
Post a Comment